U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Johnson v. Pearson

Johnson v. Pearson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 10, 1996

Johnson v. Pearson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7848

GUY R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDDIE L. PEARSON; JOSEPH GARMAN; WILLIE BOSWELL; J. A. SMITH, JR., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-95-1144-AM)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Pearson, No. CA-95-1144-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.