U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Auton v. Emery

Auton v. Emery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 10, 1996

Auton v. Emery

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7771

WINSTON V. AUTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANN EMERY, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-6214

WINSTON V. AUTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICKIE ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-900-5-CT-BO, CA-96-57) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston V. Auton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Auton v. Emery, No. CA-95-900-5-CT-BO, and Auton v. Robinson, No. CA-96-57 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 1995 and Jan. 26, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.