U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Stavrakes v. Smith

Stavrakes v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 19, 1996

Stavrakes v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7964

JAMES MORGAN STAVRAKES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 94-2625-DKC)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: April 19, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Morgan Stavrakes, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ellen Barbera, As- sistant Attorney General, Joseph A. Curran, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Stavrakes v. Smith, No. CA-94-2625-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.