U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Simmons v. Dunn

Simmons v. Dunn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 16, 1996

Simmons v. Dunn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7764

JOHN J. SIMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM DUNN, Former Solicitor of the Georgetown County Solicitor's Office; NELSON BROWN, Georgetown Police Officer; LARRY C. BATSON, SCDC General Counsel; JOHN G. NORRIS, Chief of SCDC Offender Records Branch; FLORA BROOKS BOYD, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1443-2-8AJ) Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John J. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Carol Brittian Ervin, YOUNG, CLEMENT, RIVERS & TISDALE, Charleston, South Carolina; Arrigo Paul Carotti, John Betts McCutcheon, Jr., MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Dunn, No. CA-93-1443-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.