Kelly v. Freeman
Kelly v. Freeman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8522
LEONARD RICKY KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; TOM MARTIN; ONE UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-6101
LEONARD RICKY KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN FREEMAN; TOM MARTIN; ONE UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-816)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard Ricky Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kelly v. Freeman, No. CA-95-816 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9 & Dec. 12, 1995). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.