U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Childress v. Garrett

Childress v. Garrett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 16, 1996

Childress v. Garrett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8573

LITTLE TOM CHILDRESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STEVE GARRETT, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-366-R)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Little Tom Childress, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Sanderson Lewis, SANDERS, JOHNSON & LEWIS, P.L.C., Lexington, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to allege, and the record fails to contain, facts which support a reasonable inference that Appellant was injured, if at all, in more than a de minimis way. Accordingly, we find that any force used by the Defendant did not violate the Eighth Amendment. See Norman v. Taylor, 25 F.3d 1259, 1262-63 (4th Cir. 1994) (in banc), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 63 U.S.L.W. 3538 (U.S. Jan. 17, 1995) (No. 94-6011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.