Rife v. Richmond Technical
Rife v. Richmond Technical
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2299
ROBERT W. RIFE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHMOND TECHNICAL CENTER; J. AUSTIN BROWN, Principal; DAVID NETTLES, Assistant Principal; JOSEPH FRICHTEL, Assistant Principal; JOHNNIE RICH, Principal (retired), Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-909)
Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert W. Rife, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Eppes Hudson, Kimberly Stewart Hugo, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Defendants on his employment discrimination complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rife v. Richmond Technical Ctr., No. CA-94-909 (E.D. Va. May 3 & 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.