UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2484

CHARLES GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES L. ELLIS ALDRIDGE; ODESSA CLARK, her heirs, successors, and assigns, individually; GROVER LEE MOORE, his heirs, successors and assigns, individually; ANNIE MOORE, her heirs, successors, and assigns, individually; JOHN H.

HARMON, Attorney at Law; CARRIE M. GODETTE, Defendants - Appellees, and

CLEVELAND CLARK; DAVID M. ALDRIDGE; ANNIE MAE ALDRIDGE; SALOMON MOORE; JOHN I. MORGAN, Register of Deeds of Beaufort County; BETTY WAILARD, Deputy Beaufort County Register of Deeds; BEAUFORT COUNTY, North Carolina, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-152-4-H)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Milton E. Moore, MOORE, MOORE & RODGERS, Williamston, North Carolina; James Wilson Swindell, High Point, North Carolina; John H. Harmon, HARMON & RAYNOR, New Bern, North Carolina; Franics Blackwell Stith, STITH & STITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Our review of the record and the district court's order adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge disclose no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Aldridge, No. CA-93-152-4-H (E.D.N.C. May 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED