Bosley v. Riepe

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2649

KENNETH T. BOSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JAMES S. RIEPE; JOHN B. HOWARD; ADENA W.

TESTA; EDWARD H. BERGE; GAIL P. RIEPE; MICHAEL DAVID TESTA; MELISSA L. BERGE; JAMES DORSEY

BROWN, III; CHRISTINE WEBER BROWN; WESTERN RUN COMPANY, L.C.; COLD BOTTOM, L.L.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1190-HAR)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ,* Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth T. Bosley, Appellant Pro Se. John Henry Lewin, Jr., VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his claim under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organiza- tion Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-1968 (West 1985 & Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bosley v. Riepe, No. CA-95-1190-HAR (D. Md. July 26, 1995). In light of this disposition, we deny Appellees' motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED