U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Byrd v. Eichhorn

Byrd v. Eichhorn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 2, 1996

Byrd v. Eichhorn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6069

HENRY CLIFFORD BYRD, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE A. EICHHORN, Individually and in his official capacity as an Assistant Attorney General of the State of Maryland; PAUL J.

DAVIS, Individually and in his official capac- ity as Chairman of Maryland Parole Commission; MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-95-2789-S) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting sum- mary judgment in favor of the Defendants on his action challenging the denial of executive clemency from the Governor of Maryland. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Byrd v. Eichhorn, No. CA-95-2789-S (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.