United States v. Williams
United States v. Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6191
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-80-14)
Submitted: April 23, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Alvin Jackson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his motions to correct the record and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams, No. CR-80-14 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995 & Jan. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.