U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

In RE: Montgomery v.

In RE: Montgomery v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 7, 1996

In RE: Montgomery v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7269

In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant.

No. 96-6231

In Re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (MISC-95-136) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders imposing and implementing a prefiling injunction against him. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re Michael Wayne Montgomery, No. MISC-95-136 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 1995 & Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.