U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Dotson

United States v. Dotson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 1996

United States v. Dotson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7523

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GREGORY ALEXANDER DOTSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-62-P, CR-92-240-P, CA-95-198-3-P)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Alexander Dotson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dotson, Nos. CR-92-62-P; CR-92-240-P; CA-95-198-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.