U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Todd v. Evatt

Todd v. Evatt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 1996

Todd v. Evatt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 93-6890

JOHNNIE W. TODD, a/k/a John W. Todd, a/k/a Kristopher S. Kollyns, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES SEWELL; WAYNE HYATT; TERRY BROOKS; L.

WESTFIELD; PARKER EVATT, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHNNY JACOBS, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-1060-8-17) Submitted: April 30, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie W. Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Todd v. Evatt, No. CA-92-1060-8-17 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 1993). We dismiss as moot Appellant's motion to correct the record to reflect the correct district court number. To the extent that both of Appellant's names are reflected in this opinion, we grant Appellant's motion to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.