Kidd v. Fleming

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

DAVID TERRY KIDD, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

RUFUS FLEMING, Warden; FRANK

MARDAVICH, Assistant Warden,

Treatment; DAVID ROBINSON,

Assistant Warden, Operations;

KIMBERLEY H. RUNION, Operations

Officer; KEITH DAVIS, T.P.S.;

JAMES F. HOOKE, Psychologist; CARL

MANIS, Counselor; SALLY OVERTON-

BARKSDALE, Counselor; MARIE

OAKES, Counselor; ROBYN M. No. 95-7852 CLIFTON, Former Counselor;

SERGEANT WILSON, Building

Sergeant, 8-4 Shift; L. E. NELSON;

B. STITH; FRED W. GREENE;

DAVID R. GRAHAM; CASSANDRA

TAYLOR; MR. MCCORMIC; RON

BOWEN; SERGEANT LEGGE; R.

MACKLIN, Correctional Officer,

Defendants-Appellees, and

DAWN HANES, Psychologist,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-483-2)

Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. _________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL

David Terry Kidd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). _________________________________________________________________ OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kidd v. Fleming, No. CA-94-483-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED