U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Ruiz

United States v. Ruiz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 20, 1996

United States v. Ruiz

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7877

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PASCUAL RUIZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-108; CA-95-357-2)

Submitted: April 4, 1996 Decided: May 20, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pascual Ruiz, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ruiz, Nos. CR-93-108; CA-95-357-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.