X v. Bundrick
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7922
SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, a/k/a Michael Wayne
Montgomery,
Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
RICHARD BUNDRICK, Inmate Relations Coordinator at the Maximum Security Unit; SOUTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-741-6-3AK)
Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: May 30, 1996 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. X v. Bundrick, No. CA-95-741-6-3AK (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.