U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Jones v. Robinson

Jones v. Robinson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 30, 1996

Jones v. Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7946

CHARLES JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BISHOP L. ROBINSON; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; MELANIE C. PEREIRA; WILLIAM L. SMITH; SEWALL B. SMITH; PATRICIA BRIGGS; MARGARET CHIPPEN- DALE; E. JEFFERSON; BRADLEY BUTLER; PURNELL LEAKE; OFFICER HILTON; TERRY JACKSON; W.

CLARK; A. COWARD; P. RICHARDSON; CAPTAIN MATTHEWS; OFFICER CAMPHER; CALVIN VINSON, Defendants - Appellees, and

JARMAL JOHNSON, Inmate, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94- 2375-L)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 30, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Robinson, No. CA-94-2375-L (D. Md. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.