U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Smith v. SC Budget & Control

Smith v. SC Budget & Control
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1996

Smith v. SC Budget & Control

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2911

REGINA K. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1453-3-OBC)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Regina K. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Stephen Carrington Mitchell, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Columbia, South Carolina; Joseph Dawson Shine, SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellee in this action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. South Carolina Budget & Control, No. CA-93-1453-3-OBC (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.