U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Parham v. Pepsico Inc

Parham v. Pepsico Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1996

Parham v. Pepsico Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3217

KARON ANN PARHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PEPSICO, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-307-5-BR)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karon Ann Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Louis B. Meyer, III, POYNER & SPRUILL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her trademark and copyright infringement claims and state law claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parham v. Pepsico, Inc., No. CA- 95-307-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.