U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Mick v. Reno

Mick v. Reno
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 1996

Mick v. Reno

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6305

MICHAEL G. MICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET RENO; WILLIAM THOMPSON, Warden, FCI, Morgantown, WV; BRENDA BARRETT, Health Ser- vices Administrator; A. BLANCO, Physician's Assistant; M. BLANCO, Physician's Assistant; J. AHAMED, Physician's Assistant; R. WHITENER, Physician's Assistant; VICTOR SIHA, M.D.; UNNAMED CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, P.T.U.; G. L.

BOGDEN, Assistant Warden, FCI, Morgantown, WV, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-13-1) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael G. Mick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court dismissed the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mick v. Reno, No. CA-96-13-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.