Massenburg v. Warden
Massenburg v. Warden
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6309
RICHARD A. MASSENBURG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Greensville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-857)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard A. Massenburg, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.
Massenburg v. Warden, No. CA-95-857 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(l) (West 1993).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.