U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Massenburg v. Warden

Massenburg v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 1996

Massenburg v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6309

RICHARD A. MASSENBURG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Greensville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-857)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard A. Massenburg, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.

Massenburg v. Warden, No. CA-95-857 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(l) (West 1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.