U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Bumpus v. Barrett

Bumpus v. Barrett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 1996

Bumpus v. Barrett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6277

RONNIE BUMPUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BRENDA BARRETT; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-4-1)

Submitted: May 28, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Bumpus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his Bivens* complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bumpus v. Barrett, No. CA-96-4-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb.

15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.