Yarborough v. Lofton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6145
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant, and
DELWIN EARL HARRIS,
Plaintiff, versus
JOSEPH LOFTON; S. D. STEWART; JOHNNIE LEE, and Medical Staff; LYNN PHILLIPS; FINESSE G.
COUCH, and staff; WILLIAM JENNETTE; OFFICER
LANCASTER; C. P. HINES; GLEN BRITT; TED
FERELL; VZZELL; IDA REANEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-761-5-CT-BR)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Lofton, No. CA-95-761-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.