U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Jemmott

United States v. Jemmott
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 1996

United States v. Jemmott

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6102

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRANCINA MARGARITA JEMMOTT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-92-33, CA-95-956-5-H)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francina Margarita Jemmott, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jemmott, Nos. CR-92-93; CA- 95-956-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.