U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Richmond v. Waters

Richmond v. Waters
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 1996

Richmond v. Waters

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6171

GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN WATERS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-95-2901)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Waters, No. CA-95-2901 (D. Md. Jan. 22, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.