U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Dennis v. Hunt

Dennis v. Hunt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 1996
Dennis v. Hunt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6136

MARK ANTHONY DENNIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JAMES B. HUNT, JR.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-466)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magis- trate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dennis v. Hunt, No. CA-95-466 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.