U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Taylor v. Brown, Sec

Taylor v. Brown, Sec
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1996

Taylor v. Brown, Sec

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1069

NORMAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD H. BROWN, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 93-3745-DKC)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Maury S. Epner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellee in Appellant's age discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Brown, No. CA-93-3745- DKC (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.