U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Shelburne v. United States

Shelburne v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 14, 1996

Shelburne v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6254

SHERRI PROVINCE, a/k/a Sherri Province Shelburne, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-567-R)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: June 14, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherri Province, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sherri Province appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Province v. United States, No. CA-94-567-R (W.D.

Va. Jan. 11, 1995). We deny Province's motion to hold this appeal in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 636(c)(1) (West 1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.