Welch v. Faulk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6074
VAN PRINCE WELCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
CAPTAIN FAULK; M. A. PHILLIPS, Sergeant;
SERGEANT CARTER; CORPORAL BAILEY; OFFICER
MCQUEEN,
Defendants - Appellees, and
J. R. DEWAN; E. G. TUCKER, Lieutenant,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-991-2)
Submitted: April 30, 1996 Decided: June 11, 1996
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Van Prince Welch, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, David Ian Tenzer, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Welch v. Faulk, No. CA-94-991-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.