U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Zack v. FCI Morgantown

Zack v. FCI Morgantown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 1996

Zack v. FCI Morgantown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8581

WILLIAM D. ZACK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE - MORGANTOWN, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-94-178)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William D. Zack, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Zack v. FCI Morgantown, No. CA-94-178 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.