U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Twitty v. Hubbell Premise

Twitty v. Hubbell Premise
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 1996

Twitty v. Hubbell Premise

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1164

TILLIE M. TWITTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HUBBELL PREMISE-MARION, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-95-255)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tillie M. Twitty, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this action alleging age and race discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Twitty v. Hubbell Premise-Marion, Inc., No. CA-95-255 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.