Smith v. US Army
Smith v. US Army
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1103
CHARLES ULYSSES SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES ARMY; BOARD OF MILITARY CORREC- TION; BOARD OF MILITARY REVIEW, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3483-H)
Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Ulysses Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his pro se complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2675-80 (1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. United States Army, No. CA-95-3483-H (D. Md. Dec. 6, 1995; Jan. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.