McDonald v. George Meany Cntr
McDonald v. George Meany Cntr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1061
MICHAEL T. MCDONALD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE MEANY CENTER FOR LABOR STUDIES, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, District Judge. (CA-95-63-3)
Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. Grant F. Crandall, George P. Surmaitis, CRANDALL, PYLES & HAVILAND, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, McDonald's motion for appointment of counsel is denied and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDonald v. George Meany Ctr., No. CA-95-63-3 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.