UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6024

GREGORY MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM, SR., Commissioner; JAMES PEGUES, Major; M. MORGAN, Lieutenant; MAJOR MIDDLETON; FREDERICK JONES, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-839-B)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Audrey J. S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marshall v. Smith, No. CA-94-839-B (D. Md. Nov. 21, 1995).

We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED