U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Mansell v. Smalkin

Mansell v. Smalkin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 1996

Mansell v. Smalkin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1282

PATRICE MANSELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FREDERIC N. SMALKIN, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-454-H)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrice Mansell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's dismissal of his claim seeking money damages against a federal district court judge in his official capacity. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mansell v. Smalkin, No. CA-96-454-H (D. Md. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.