UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1184

CONSTANCE E. ARTHUR; DELMER ARTHUR, her hus- band; NATHANIEL ARTHUR, an infant child, by his natural mother and next friend, Constance E. Arthur, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPO- RATED, a Delaware corporation, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-182-2)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Constance E. Arthur, Appellant Pro Se. David Besserer Thomas, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting costs to Defendant. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Arthur v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., No. CA-93-182-2 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED