U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Plath v. Beasley

Plath v. Beasley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 1996

Plath v. Beasley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8500

JOHN HERMAN PLATH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID BEASLEY, Governor; MICHAEL B. MOORE, Director, Department of Corrections; SERGEANT FOSTER; PRIS MACK, Deputy Warden; SERGEANT JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-2985-6-3AK)

Submitted: June 20, 1995 Decided: June 27, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Herman Plath, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. We affirmed that order. Plath v. Beasley, No. 95-7902 (4th Cir. May 30, 1996) (un- published). Finding no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of reconsideration, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.