U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Haynes v. Town of Summerville

Haynes v. Town of Summerville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 1996

Haynes v. Town of Summerville

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7888

JOHN A. HAYNES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWN OF SUMMERVILLE; SUMMERVILLE POLICE DE- PARTMENT; M. DYCHES, Corporal, in her personal and official capacity; JOHN DOE LAPOLLA, De- tective, in his personal and official capac- ity; JOHN DOE ROSS, Detective, in his personal and official capacity; MICHAEL MILLER, Detec- tive, in his personal and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2118-2-6BC) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. Town of Summerville, No. CA-93-2118-2-6BC (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 1994 and Nov. 2, 1995). We deny Appellant's motions for hearing by separate panels and for an investigation by this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.