U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Creech v. Woodall

Creech v. Woodall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 1996

Creech v. Woodall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6185

PAUL KEITH CREECH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus M. B. WOODALL; WILL R. CROCKER; SHELIA W.

ADAMS; BETSY Y. JUSTUS, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-4-5-CT-BR)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Keith Creech, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Creech v. Woodall, No. CA-96-4-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.