U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Zulu X v. State of SC

Zulu X v. State of SC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 1996

Zulu X v. State of SC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6172

SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, formerly known as Michael Wayne Montgomery, a/k/a Thomas Edward Howard, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (MC-95-221-6-3AK)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 25, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Zulu X v. South Carolina, No. CA-MC-95-221-6-3AK (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.