U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Cook v. Harless

Cook v. Harless
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 1996

Cook v. Harless

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6413

QUINTON LEE COOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. HARLESS; MR. WINGLER; MR. HOLLOWAY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-7-5-MU)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 25, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton Lee Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cook v. Harless, No. CA-96-7-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.