U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Hunter v. Crouch Construction

Hunter v. Crouch Construction
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 3, 1996

Hunter v. Crouch Construction

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3204

NATHANIEL HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CROUCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-3485-3-17BD)

Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: July 3, 1996

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. David Eugene Dubberly, Kenneth Lendren Childs, Geoffrey Ross Bonham, CHILDS & DUFF, P.A., Colum- bia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court's earlier order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief in his em- ployment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hunter v. Crouch Construction Co., No. CA-94-3485-3-17BD (D.S.C. Dec. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.