Dockery v. Hill
Dockery v. Hill
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6420
WILLIE DOCKERY, Department of Corrections Unit #4630, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARTHA HILL, Unit Nurse at Unit #4630; DR. POWELL, Unit Psychologist at Unit #4630; SERGEANT WILSON, Unit Sergeant at Unit #4630; JAMES B. TENNEY, M.D., Director, Health Ser- vices, Buncombe County Investigation of Martha Hill, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-2) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Dockery, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Keith Spurling Snyder, BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dockery v. Hill, No. CA-95-2 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.