U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Remer v. Zervakos

Remer v. Zervakos
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 1996

Remer v. Zervakos

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6205

MICHAEL D. REMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. ZERVAKOS, CCMS; J. CUMMONS, CCMM; G.

LOVICK, Parole Hearing Officer; MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 94-3099-PJM) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Remer, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Remer v. Zervakos, No. CA-94-3099-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.