U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Pugh v. Freeman

Pugh v. Freeman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 1996
Pugh v. Freeman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6263

JIMMY WAYNE PUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN; HARRY CHAMBERS; GARY LUTHER; JOHN MILLS; GARY MILLER; HAZEL KEITH; OTHER

UNKNOWN PRISON OFFICIALS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-30-5-F)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Wayne Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pugh v. Freeman, No. CA-96-30-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.