Foley v. Snider, Corr Off
Foley v. Snider, Corr Off
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6265
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SNIDER; LIEUTENANT BOYER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-156-R)
Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 9, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(d) (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Snider, No. CA-96-156-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.