U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Borsody v. Commissioner

Borsody v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 1996

Borsody v. Commissioner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-1724

FRANK J. BORSODY; KATHRYN A. BORSODY, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 7690-90, 28454-91)

Submitted: March 31, 1995 Decided: August 2, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank J. Borsody, Kathryn A. Borsody, Appellants Pro Se. David I.

Pincus, Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Annette Marie Wietecha, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Dr. Frank Borsody and his wife, Kathryn Borsody, appeal from the tax court's decision finding them liable for additional taxes and penalties with respect to their 1987, 1988, and 1989 income tax liabilities. Our review of the record and the tax court's opinion reveals that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Borsody v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. Nos. 7690-90, 28454-91 (U.S. Tax Court, Dec. 2, 1993; Mar. 7, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* In light of this disposition, the Appellants' motion to stay is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.