U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Caira

United States v. Caira
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 31, 1996

United States v. Caira

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERTO CAIRA, a/k/a Rangeen Khan, a/k/a Claude Bernard, a/k/a Jorge Miladeh, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., District Judge. (CR-86-5, CR-86-162, CA-94-3014-2-8)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alberto Caira, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reason- ing of the district court. United States v. Caira, Nos. CR-86-5; CR-86-162; CA-94-3014-2-8 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1996). We deny Appel- lant's motion to expedite the appeal in light of this disposition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.