U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1996

Fuller v. Glendening

Fuller v. Glendening
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 1996

Fuller v. Glendening

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7762

GERALD DAVIS FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARRIS GLENDENING, Governor; BISHOP ROBINSON, Secretary; RICHARD LANHAM, SR.; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 95-3068-S) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court, with the modification that the dismissal be without prejudice. Fuller v. Glendening, No. CA-95-3068-S (D. Md. Oct. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.